Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Former President Obama and Biden
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of sensational language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.
The title 'Nope, this is humiliating' and the description of the RNC's attempt to shame Obama as 'backfiring' on Trump are sensational and designed to provoke a strong emotional response.
Use a neutral title and describe the RNC's actions without implying a backfire or humiliation.
The headline suggests a direct negative outcome for Trump which is not substantiated by the content.
The headline implies that the RNC's attempt to shame Obama directly backfired on Trump, which is not clearly supported by the article's content.
Rephrase the headline to accurately reflect the content of the article.
Leaving out information that is important to understand the full context.
The article does not provide sufficient context about why the RNC's attempt is considered humiliating or how it backfired on Trump, nor does it provide Trump's perspective or response.
Include more background information and a response or perspective from Trump or his representatives.
Language that is partial or prejudiced towards one side.
Phrases like 'ritzy fundraising' and 'the MAGA right already got what they wanted' carry a negative connotation and suggest bias against the subjects.
Use neutral language to describe events and groups.
Reporting that disproportionately covers one side of an issue.
The article focuses heavily on criticisms of Trump and the RNC, with little to no representation of their viewpoints or responses.
Provide a more balanced view by including statements or perspectives from both sides of the issue.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The use of emotionally charged language such as 'humiliating' and highlighting negative anecdotes about Trump is designed to elicit an emotional response rather than present an objective argument.
Present information in a way that is factual and neutral, avoiding language that is designed to provoke an emotional response.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.