Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article uses multiple exclamation marks and phrases like 'Let's fucking go' to create excitement.
Remove excessive exclamation marks and moderate language to maintain a neutral tone.
Claims that are presented without sufficient evidence or support.
The article presents fan theories and social media activity as potential evidence for a collaboration without official confirmation.
Clearly label fan theories as speculation and indicate that there is no official confirmation.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article appeals to the emotions of fans by using phrases like 'I know you're hearing this call' and 'itching for a sequel'.
Present information in a more objective manner without appealing to the emotions of the fanbase.
The tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.
The article seems to favor the interpretation of social media posts that align with the theory of a collaboration, without considering alternative explanations.
Include alternative interpretations of the social media posts and make it clear that they are not definitive proof of a collaboration.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.