Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Engagement Rumors
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's title and content use sensationalist language to provoke excitement about the rumored engagement.
Use a more neutral tone and title that reflects the speculative nature of the content.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests a breakdown of engagement rumors, but the article does not provide a thorough analysis, only a collection of rumors and statements.
Rewrite the headline to more accurately reflect the speculative nature of the content.
Taking quotes out of their original context to change their meaning.
The article quotes various people without providing sufficient context for their statements, which could mislead readers about their intentions.
Provide full context for each quote to ensure the original meaning is preserved.
Use of sources without names, which can make information less credible.
The article relies on 'sources', 'insiders', and 'friends' without revealing their identities, making it difficult to verify the information.
Whenever possible, use named sources to increase credibility.
Claims that are presented without evidence to support them.
The article presents various claims about the couple's future plans without providing evidence.
Provide evidence for the claims made or clarify that they are rumors and not confirmed facts.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotional language, such as 'Marry me, Juliet, you'll never have to be alone I love you, and that's all I really know,' to engage readers emotionally rather than presenting objective information.
Remove emotional language and focus on presenting the facts.
Content whose main purpose is to attract attention and encourage visitors to click on a link to a particular web page.
The article's title and sensationalist content serve as clickbait to draw readers in without providing substantial information.
Ensure that titles and content are informative and reflective of the article's actual content.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.