Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Donald Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of dramatic language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.
The title 'Joe Biden should be angry and anxious' and phrases like 'For the love of God' and 'Holy…' are sensationalist and designed to provoke an emotional response.
Use a neutral title and avoid dramatic language.
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's preferences.
Phrases like 'old yeller', 'I knew Kamala Harris would mess up the border', and 'visibly in decline' indicate a negative bias against Joe Biden and his administration.
Use neutral descriptions and avoid language that indicates a judgment.
Claims made without evidence or support.
The article makes claims such as 'Biden’s approval rating of around 40 percent is in the danger zone' and 'It would become undeniable that his pick of Harris, which helped keep Democrats from pushing for him to step aside, was a terrible mistake' without providing evidence or context.
Provide evidence or data to support claims.
Leaving out information that is important for understanding the full context.
The article does not provide information on the broader context of Biden's approval ratings or the complexities of the issues mentioned, such as immigration policy and inflation.
Include a broader range of information and perspectives to provide context.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests that the author knows Biden's emotional state, which is not substantiated in the article.
Ensure the headline accurately reflects the content of the article.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses dramatic language and scenarios to evoke fear and anxiety about Biden's re-election prospects.
Focus on factual information and logical arguments rather than emotional appeals.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.