Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Peggy Grande/Reagan's Policies
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of sensational language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.
'Enemies of freedom' taking advantage of 'incredibly weak' Joe Biden to destabilize US - The language used in the headline and throughout the article is sensational and designed to provoke an emotional response.
Use neutral language in the headline and avoid terms like 'incredibly weak' without providing evidence.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests a broad consensus on the weakness of the Biden administration, which is not supported by the content that primarily reflects the opinion of one individual.
Rephrase the headline to indicate that it reflects an individual's opinion, not a fact.
Use of language that is not neutral and shows a particular preference.
Terms like 'enemies of freedom' and 'axis of evil' are loaded and biased, suggesting a clear good-versus-evil narrative.
Replace biased terms with neutral descriptions of the countries or groups being discussed.
Presenting one viewpoint without the counterbalancing views.
The article exclusively presents Grande's critical perspective of the Biden administration without offering a defense or alternative viewpoints.
Include statements or perspectives from sources that support or explain the Biden administration's policies.
Using an authority figure's opinion as evidence without supporting data.
The article relies on Grande's authority as a former White House official without providing factual evidence to support her claims.
Provide data or evidence to back up Grande's claims about the Biden administration's foreign policy.
Leaving out important data or information that could change the perception of the reported story.
The article does not mention any successes or alternative perspectives on the Biden administration's foreign policy, which could provide a more balanced view.
Include information on the Biden administration's foreign policy achievements or rationale.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.