Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Donald Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The article focuses more on Rubio's past criticisms of Trump and his current endorsement, which could imply a negative portrayal of Rubio.
The article emphasizes Rubio's change of stance without providing similar examples of other politicians who have done the same, which could lead to an unbalanced view of Rubio's actions.
Provide examples of other politicians who have changed their stance after primaries to provide balance.
Highlight the commonality of such political endorsements post-primaries.
The use of charged language such as 'con artist' and 'utterly amoral' in reference to past comments made by Rubio and Cruz about Trump may evoke an emotional response from the reader.
Quotes like 'friends do not let friends vote for con artists' are presented to contrast with Rubio's current endorsement, which could be seen as an attempt to elicit an emotional reaction regarding his credibility.
Present Rubio's change of stance in a more neutral tone without emphasizing emotionally charged language.
The article repeats its commitment to challenging conventional wisdom, which could be seen as an attempt to frame its narrative.
The phrase 'Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground' is repeated twice, which may unnecessarily reinforce the publication's perspective.
Remove the repeated statement to avoid potential framing effects.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.