Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Kendrick Lamar
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The headline and content suggest a strong emotional reaction from Drake to Kendrick Lamar's diss without evidence.
Provide evidence for claims, avoid assuming emotional states without confirmation.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests that Drake's despondent look is due to Kendrick Lamar's diss, which is not confirmed in the article.
Rewrite the headline to accurately reflect the content of the article.
Taking quotes out of their original context to change their meaning.
Kendrick Lamar's lyrics are quoted without sufficient context to understand the full meaning.
Provide more context around the quoted lyrics.
Language that is partial or prejudiced towards particular views.
The article uses language that seems to favor Kendrick Lamar's position, describing his verse as 'ripping' Drake 'to shreds'.
Use neutral language to describe events and opinions.
Claims that are made without evidence to support them.
The article claims Drake looks sad in new photos, implying it's due to Kendrick's diss without evidence.
Avoid making claims without evidence, or clearly label speculation as such.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article plays on the emotions of the reader by suggesting Drake is 'down in the dumps' without evidence.
Focus on factual reporting rather than emotional speculation.
Creating a story or pattern from unrelated or insufficient data.
The article weaves a narrative that Drake's appearance and mood are directly related to Kendrick Lamar's diss track.
Avoid creating narratives without sufficient evidence to support them.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.