Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Alderman Lamont Robinson
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Using emotionally charged or subjective terminology instead of neutral language.
The phrase 'draws fury' in the headline is an example of biased language, suggesting a very strong emotional response from the Italian American group which may not accurately represent the group's official position.
Use neutral language in the headline, such as 'Proposal in Chicago to change Columbus Drive to Barack Obama Drive meets opposition from Italian American group'.
Leaving out important facts or details that could change the reader's perception of the story.
The article does not provide information on the views of other community groups or the general public, which could offer a more balanced perspective on the issue.
Include opinions from other community groups, local residents, and historical experts to provide a more comprehensive view of the situation.
Presenting one side of an argument more favorably than the other without a neutral standpoint.
The article seems to give more weight to Alderman Lamont Robinson's perspective by quoting his intentions and goals, while the Italian American group's concerns are briefly mentioned without much elaboration.
Provide equal space and depth to the concerns and arguments of both sides to ensure balanced reporting.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.