Royals called out on Twitter over edited image of Queen Elizabeth.

[ 18/03/2024 15:31 ] Read on thenational.scot

Report Overview: The article presents a critical view of the Kensington Palace's handling of photographs, highlighting instances of digital alteration. While it does provide evidence of the manipulations and includes a community note questioning the authenticity of the images, the article lacks a response from Kensington Palace, which could provide balance. The language is mostly neutral, but the article could be seen as leaning towards a critical perspective of the Palace's actions.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Critics

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Omission of key information

The article does not include a response or comment from Kensington Palace, which could provide necessary context or an explanation for the actions taken.

The article states 'Kensington Palace has been asked for comment' but does not include any response, which could lead to an unbalanced view of the situation.

Include any statements or responses from Kensington Palace if available, or note the lack of response more prominently to clarify that their perspective is not represented.

Unbalanced reporting

The article focuses primarily on the criticism of the Kensington Palace without providing a balanced view that includes the Palace's perspective or reasoning.

The article details the digital alterations and the criticism from various sources but lacks information from the Palace's side, which could offer a more balanced report.

Seek out and include any official statements or explanations from Kensington Palace to balance the reporting.

Appeal to authority

The article references the authority of international news agencies like Agence France-Presse (AFP) to support the claim that Kensington Palace is no longer a trusted source.

Mentioning that 'Kensington Palace was no longer a trusted source for images after a row over an image of Kate and her children which was released on mother’s day' without providing sufficient evidence for such a claim.

Provide more context or evidence to support the claim that Kensington Palace is no longer a trusted source, rather than relying on the authority of AFP alone.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.