Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of information from sources without revealing their identity.
The article quotes an 'ex-Biden aide' without revealing their identity, which can undermine the credibility of the information.
Provide the identity of the source or corroborate the statement with named sources.
Use of shocking or exciting language to provoke public interest or excitement, at the expense of accuracy.
The headline 'An ex-Biden aide said Obama staffers thought Biden would 'suck' in the White House' uses sensational language that may not accurately reflect the nuanced opinions of Obama staffers.
Use a more neutral headline that reflects the complexity of the staffers' opinions.
Claims made without providing evidence or support.
The claim that 'The Obama people thought Biden would suck as president' is presented without substantial evidence or broader context.
Provide evidence or a broader range of opinions to support the claim.
Reporting that disproportionately covers one viewpoint or aspect of a story.
The article focuses on the negative opinions of some Obama staffers without providing a balanced view of positive opinions or the overall sentiment among the staffers.
Include opinions from staffers who had a positive view of Biden's potential as president to balance the reporting.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.