Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Jen Psaki
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting quotes in a way that changes their meaning or doesn't reflect the full intent.
The article quotes Donald Trump's 'bloodbath' comment without providing sufficient context to understand its intended meaning.
Provide the full transcript or video of the speech to allow readers to understand the context of the 'bloodbath' comment.
Using language that is not neutral and suggests a particular viewpoint.
The use of terms like 'systematically dismantled' and 'embrace of political violence' suggests a negative portrayal of Trump's campaign.
Use neutral language to describe the actions and statements of both sides.
Leaving out information that is important for understanding the full story.
The article does not provide information on the Trump campaign's response to the criticisms or any context that might support their claims.
Include the Trump campaign's full response and any supporting evidence they may provide.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article appeals to emotion by highlighting Trump's 'dehumanizing language' and 'refusal to condemn white supremacists' without a balanced discussion.
Present facts without emotional language and provide a balanced view of the situation.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.