Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Biden
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of shocking or exciting language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement.
The title 'Donald Trump wanted to create an 'alpha rough guy presence' during unhinged 'bloodbath' speech' uses sensational language to describe Trump's demeanor and speech.
Use a neutral title that describes the event without emotive language.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests that Trump's speech was 'unhinged' without providing evidence for this characterization within the article.
Rephrase the headline to reflect the content of the speech without editorializing.
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's preferences.
Terms like 'unhinged', 'bloodbath', and 'growling shout' are used to describe Trump and his speech, which are not neutral descriptors.
Replace biased terms with neutral language that accurately describes the events.
Leaving out information that is important to understanding the full context of the situation.
The article does not provide sufficient context for Trump's 'bloodbath' comment, such as what specific policies he was referring to.
Include more information about the context of Trump's comments and the policies he was discussing.
Presenting one side of an argument or story without a fair representation of the opposing viewpoint.
The article focuses heavily on negative descriptions of Trump and his speech, with less attention given to the substance of his policies or the response from his campaign.
Provide a more balanced view by including more information from Trump's campaign and supporters.
Claims that are made without evidence to support them.
The article includes the Biden campaign's accusation that Trump wants 'another January 6' without evidence to support this claim.
Either provide evidence for the claim or present it as an opinion rather than a fact.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.