Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's focus on the 'Photoshop scandal' and the emotional impact on the royal family adds a sensationalist tone.
Focus on the facts surrounding the photo release without emphasizing the scandal.
A headline that is not supported by the text of the article or exaggerates the article's content.
The headline suggests a significant indecision and scandal, which is not fully supported by the article's content.
Use a headline that accurately reflects the content of the article, such as 'Royal Family to Release Prince Louis' Birthday Photo Amid Recent Editing Apology'.
Claims that are presented without evidence or support.
The article mentions 'clumsy edits' and 'harsh criticism' without providing specific evidence or examples.
Provide evidence or examples of the edits and criticism, or clarify that these are allegations.
Use of sources without names or clear affiliations, which can affect the credibility of the information.
The article relies on statements from an unnamed 'source' and a 'friend and advisor of the couple,' which may affect the credibility of the information.
Whenever possible, use named sources or provide more information about the source's relationship to the subject matter.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article describes Middleton as 'devastated' and 'self-proclaimed amateur photographer,' which may be an attempt to elicit sympathy from the reader.
Present information about Middleton's role and reaction in a neutral tone without appealing to the reader's emotions.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.