Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Sprinter Seltzer
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of language that exaggerates the positivity to create a buzz.
The article uses phrases like 'worth buying', 'best tasting vodka soda I've ever tried', and 'completely won me over' to sensationalize the product.
Provide a more balanced view by including potential drawbacks or comparing it to similar products without excessive praise.
Language that shows a preference for one side over another.
The author uses subjective language such as 'I mean it when I say', 'I believe her', and 'I guess these just earned a spot in my beach bag' to express personal bias.
Use objective language and present facts without personal bias.
Reporting that only presents one side of an issue.
The article exclusively presents positive aspects of the product without mentioning any potential negatives or alternative views.
Include alternative opinions or reviews that may not be as positive to provide a balanced perspective.
Using an authority figure's opinion to support a claim without further evidence.
The article mentions Chandra Richter's credentials to add credibility to the product without providing evidence of the product's quality.
Provide evidence of the product's quality beyond the authority figure's involvement.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article appeals to the reader's emotions by describing the seltzer as 'lightly sweet, boldly flavored, and effervescent' and emphasizing the lack of hangover.
Focus on factual information such as ingredients and nutritional content rather than emotional descriptors.
The tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.
The author admits to being skeptical at first but then confirms their own positive bias by stating the product 'won me over at the first sip'.
Acknowledge the initial skepticism and provide a more critical analysis of the product.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.