Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Social Media Influencer
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The headline suggests a dramatic alliance between Trader Joe's, Amazon, and Elon Musk, which is not substantiated in the article.
Use a more accurate and less provocative headline that reflects the content of the article.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline implies a collaboration between Trader Joe's, Amazon, and Elon Musk, which is not the case according to the article's content.
Rewrite the headline to accurately reflect the article's content.
Taking quotes out of their original context in a way that changes their meaning.
The article quotes a social media influencer without providing sufficient context for his claims, potentially misrepresenting the situation.
Provide full context for quotes to ensure accurate representation of the speaker's intent.
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's preferences.
Terms like 'commie bastard' and 'oft-maligned billionaires' introduce bias into the article.
Use neutral language that does not carry connotations or judgments.
Reporting that disproportionately covers one viewpoint or one side of an issue.
The article focuses heavily on the social media influencer's perspective and allegations without providing a balanced view from Trader Joe's.
Include responses or comments from Trader Joe's to provide a balanced perspective.
Choosing sources that support one side of an argument while ignoring others.
The article relies on a social media influencer and comments from individuals without providing evidence or sourcing from independent or authoritative sources.
Incorporate a range of sources, including independent and authoritative ones, to support claims.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
Statements like 'I love Trader Joe's food but I love liberation more' are designed to evoke an emotional response rather than present an objective argument.
Focus on factual information and logical reasoning rather than emotional appeals.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.