Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of sensational language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.
The article uses phrases like 'hate being in the same room' and 'sneers her dad settled for Slovenian seconds' which are sensational and designed to provoke a strong emotional response.
Remove sensational language and present the facts in a neutral tone.
A headline that does not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests that the feud endangers Trump's campaign, but the article does not provide substantial evidence to support this claim.
Rewrite the headline to accurately reflect the content of the article.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'gold-digging opportunist' and 'spoiled brat' to elicit a response from the reader.
Use objective language and avoid emotionally charged terms.
Use of sources without names which can't be verified.
The article quotes an unnamed 'source close to the family' and 'insider', which cannot be verified for credibility.
Provide information from named and credible sources or indicate the reason for anonymity and the source's potential bias.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.