Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Critics
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of sensational language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.
The title and content use phrases like 'slamming hard', 'abusing', 'tormenting', which are sensational and may not accurately represent the situation.
Use neutral language in the title, such as 'Viewers express concern over Twitch streamer Kai Cenat's interaction with animals during live-stream.'
Avoid emotionally charged words in the content and provide a balanced view of the incident.
Language that is partial or prejudiced towards one side.
The article uses biased language such as 'tormenting', 'sparked outrage', 'condemned', which suggests a negative view towards Kai Cenat without providing his perspective.
Include statements from Kai Cenat or his representatives to provide his side of the story.
Use neutral language to describe the events and the reactions.
Claims made without providing evidence or sources.
The article states 'The bird’s distress was evident' and 'He almost threw the gaming chair over the parrot' without providing evidence or sources to substantiate these claims.
Provide evidence or sources for claims made, such as video footage or expert opinions on animal behavior.
Clarify that these are observations or opinions if no concrete evidence is available.
A headline that does not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests that there is a consensus on the 'abusing' and 'tormenting' of animals, which may not be the case.
Adjust the headline to reflect the controversy rather than presenting it as a fact, such as 'Twitch streamer Kai Cenat faces backlash over animal treatment during live-stream.'
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.