Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of sensational language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.
The article describes Trump's potential victory as 'gargantuan' and 'the greatest political comeback in the history of mankind', which are hyperbolic and sensationalist.
Use neutral language to describe the political event.
Headlines that misrepresent the content of the article.
The headline suggests that Trump's victory is a foregone conclusion, which is misleading as the event has not yet occurred.
Rephrase the headline to reflect the speculative nature of the event.
Language that is partial or prejudiced towards one side.
The article uses biased language in favor of Trump, such as 'total romp' and 'pyrrhic victory' for Haley.
Use neutral terms to describe the performance of the candidates.
Claims made without evidence to support them.
The article makes claims about Trump's lead and Haley's performance without providing evidence or sources.
Provide evidence or sources for the claims made about the candidates' performances.
Leaving out information that is important to understand the full context.
The article omits information about other candidates and focuses primarily on Trump, Haley, and Biden.
Include information about other candidates to provide a more balanced view.
Choosing sources that support one's argument while ignoring others.
The article cites specific polls and exit polls that favor Trump without mentioning any that might show a different picture.
Include a variety of sources to present a more balanced perspective.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.