Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of emotionally charged words and phrases that indicate a clear bias.
Terms like 'Genocide Joe', 'Hamas sympathizers', 'Hamas barbarians', and 'crushing defeat' indicate a strong bias against Biden and in favor of Trump's stance.
Use neutral language to describe individuals and groups, such as 'critics of Joe Biden' instead of 'Genocide Joe', and 'supporters of Hamas' instead of 'Hamas sympathizers'.
The use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement.
The headline and phrases like 'got to finish the problem' and 'crushing defeat for the Hamas barbarians' are sensationalist and designed to provoke a strong emotional response.
Rephrase the headline to be more neutral and avoid using provocative language that may sensationalize the conflict.
Claims made without evidence to support them.
The article claims 'Americans endorse this message. Polls show they really do,' without providing any evidence or sources for these polls.
Provide evidence for claims made, such as citing specific polls and providing data to support statements about public opinion.
Reporting that disproportionately covers one side of an issue or one perspective.
The article heavily favors Trump's perspective and provides little to no coverage of Biden's position or rationale.
Include Biden's perspective and reasoning to provide a more balanced view of the situation.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses phrases like 'Hamas barbarians' and 'endless ceasefires that Hamas never abides by' to evoke an emotional response rather than presenting a reasoned argument.
Focus on presenting factual information and reasoned arguments instead of language designed to evoke an emotional response.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.