Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Biden
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The title 'Trump crowd goes silent as he confuses Biden and Obama again' uses sensationalism to grab attention by emphasizing the crowd's reaction and the confusion.
Use a more neutral title that simply states the event, such as 'Trump makes a verbal gaffe regarding Biden and Obama during speech'.
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's preferences.
Phrases like 'horrible war', 'so little respect', and 'confused Trump' indicate a negative bias towards Trump.
Replace biased terms with neutral language, e.g., 'ongoing conflict' instead of 'horrible war', and 'Trump's apparent confusion' instead of 'confused Trump'.
Leaving out information that is important to understanding the full context of the situation.
The article does not provide information on whether Trump corrected himself or the context in which these statements were made.
Include any subsequent corrections made by Trump and additional context surrounding the statements.
Presenting one side of an argument or story without a fair representation of the opposing viewpoint.
The article focuses heavily on Trump's gaffes and includes multiple criticisms from opponents, but it lacks a response or perspective from Trump or his supporters.
Provide a response from Trump's campaign or supporters to balance the viewpoints presented.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.