Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Critics of Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of language that implies a negative connotation towards one side's actions.
Phrases like 'Trump is feeling more "confident" in his legal abilities to postpone criminal proceedings' suggest a negative framing of Trump's legal strategies without providing a neutral viewpoint.
Use neutral language to describe the legal strategies without implying intent or character judgments.
The use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's tone and choice of words such as 'swiftly changing course' and 'accused of obstructing' seem designed to elicit an emotional response rather than presenting facts neutrally.
Present the legal developments in a straightforward manner without using language that suggests drama or wrongdoing.
Leaving out important facts or details that could help the reader understand the full context.
The article does not provide sufficient background on the legal proceedings or the reasons behind the scheduling requests, which could help readers understand the complexity of the situation.
Include more background information on the legal proceedings and the typical reasons for scheduling requests in such cases.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.