Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Donald Trump
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The title ‘Bush v. Gore 2.0’: Fears Grow Supreme Court Will Bail Donald Trump Out' uses sensationalism to provoke a strong emotional response.
Use a more neutral title that reflects the content of the article without suggesting a predetermined outcome.
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's preferences.
Phrases like 'MAGA Supreme Court' and 'ginormous self-test' exhibit a clear bias against the Supreme Court's conservative majority.
Replace biased terms with neutral descriptions of the Supreme Court.
Reporting that does not fairly represent all sides of an issue.
The article predominantly presents opinions that are critical of the Supreme Court and Donald Trump, with little to no representation of opposing viewpoints.
Include statements or opinions from sources that support the Supreme Court's decision to hear the case.
Claims that are made without evidence to support them.
The article suggests that the Supreme Court is intentionally delaying the trial to protect Trump without providing evidence for this claim.
Provide evidence for claims made or present them as opinions rather than facts.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language to create a sense of urgency and injustice, such as 'fears that the former president won’t go to trial' and 'escape accountability'.
Use neutral language that focuses on the facts of the case rather than emotional reactions.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.