Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Jill Biden/Democrats
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of language that implies a subjective opinion or preference.
Phrases like 'Trump has spent a lifetime tearing us down' and 'mocks women's bodies, disrespects our accomplishments and brags about assault' are examples of biased language that present a subjective viewpoint rather than an objective fact.
Replace subjective language with objective descriptions of actions and verifiable facts.
The use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's title and content use sensational language to describe Jill Biden's statements about Donald Trump, such as 'casts Donald Trump as a threat to women' and 'killing Roe v. Wade,' which are designed to provoke an emotional response.
Use neutral language that accurately reflects the content of the speech without sensationalizing the statements.
Leaving out important facts or details that could give a more balanced view of the situation.
The article does not provide sufficient context or information about the opposing viewpoint, particularly the Trump campaign's perspective on issues important to women, other than a brief mention of border security and the economy.
Include more information about the Trump campaign's policies and statements regarding women's issues to provide a balanced view.
A lack of balance in reporting, where one side is given more favorable coverage than the other.
The article heavily focuses on Jill Biden's perspective and the Democratic campaign, with only a brief mention of the Trump campaign's counterpoints, leading to unbalanced reporting.
Provide equal space and depth of coverage to both sides' viewpoints and policies.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
Statements like 'We are the first generation in half a century to give our daughters a country with fewer rights than we had' are designed to elicit an emotional response rather than presenting an objective argument.
Focus on presenting factual information and logical arguments rather than appealing to emotions.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.