Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Joe Biden
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of sensational language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.
The title 'Donald Trump's most embarrassing recent gaffes as expert warns he's 'dangerously demented'' uses sensational language to attract readers.
Use a neutral title that does not imply a conclusion about the subject's mental state.
Language that is partial or prejudiced towards particular views.
The phrase 'dangerously demented' is a strong, biased term that suggests a conclusion without presenting objective evidence.
Present the expert's opinion as a subjective assessment and provide counterpoints for balance.
Claims made without providing evidence or support.
The claim that Trump is 'showing signs of mental decline' is presented without substantial evidence.
Provide evidence or studies that support the claim, or present it as an opinion rather than a fact.
Using an authority as evidence in your argument when the authority is not really an authority on the facts relevant to the argument.
The article cites Dr. John Gartner's opinion as a definitive assessment of Trump's mental state.
Acknowledge that the opinion is from one expert and that there may be other valid, differing opinions.
A headline that gives a false impression or misrepresents the content of the article.
The headline suggests that Trump's gaffes are a result of being 'dangerously demented', which is a subjective interpretation not conclusively supported by the article's content.
Rewrite the headline to reflect the content more accurately, such as 'Expert raises concerns over Trump's recent gaffes'.
Leaving out information that is important to understanding the full context.
The article does not provide information on the criteria used by Dr. Gartner to diagnose Trump, nor does it mention any opposing views or assessments.
Include information on the diagnostic criteria and present alternative assessments for a more balanced view.
Presenting one viewpoint without the counterbalancing views.
The article focuses on Trump's gaffes and an expert's opinion on his mental state without providing a balanced perspective or response from Trump or his representatives.
Include responses or comments from Trump or his team to provide balance.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.