Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article uses sensational language such as 'mercilessly roasted' and 'freaked out,' which may not accurately represent the nature of the interaction.
Use neutral language to describe the interaction between Kai Cenat and Shannon Sharpe.
A headline that is not supported by the text of the article or misrepresents the content.
The headline suggests a physical confrontation ('Kai Cenat Confronts Shannon Sharpe') which is not the case as described in the article.
Change the headline to accurately reflect the content of the article, such as 'Kai Cenat Responds to Shannon Sharpe's Comments on Stream'.
Language that is partial or prejudiced towards particular views or outcomes.
The article uses biased language when describing the dunk as 'underwhelming' and Cenat's reaction as 'freaked out,' which may not be impartial.
Describe the dunk and Cenat's reaction without using language that implies judgment.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.