Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
White House
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The headline 'Joe Biden's drug czar is the main reason behind White House's ‘toxic’ environment: Report' uses sensational language to attract attention.
Use a more neutral headline that reflects the content of the article without implying causation.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests that Dr. Gupta is the main reason for a 'toxic' environment, which is a subjective claim not conclusively supported by the article's content.
Rephrase the headline to accurately reflect the allegations made in the article without asserting them as fact.
Use of language that is not neutral and shows author's prejudice.
Phrases like 'neglecting his duties' and 'missed deadlines' imply a negative judgment without providing sufficient context or evidence.
Provide evidence for claims made and use neutral language to describe the situation.
Leaving out important details that could change the reader's perception.
The article does not provide Dr. Gupta's response to the allegations or any context from the White House, which could offer a different perspective.
Include any statements or responses from Dr. Gupta or the White House regarding the allegations.
Presenting one viewpoint without the counterbalancing views.
The article focuses heavily on the negative allegations against Dr. Gupta without presenting his achievements or the viewpoint of those who may support him.
Include positive feedback or achievements of Dr. Gupta and viewpoints from his supporters to balance the reporting.
Claims that are not supported by evidence or sources.
The article makes several claims about Dr. Gupta's behavior and management style without providing concrete evidence or citing specific incidents.
Provide evidence or specific examples to support the claims made about Dr. Gupta's behavior.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.