Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Democrats
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of language that is not neutral and shows the author's personal bias.
Terms like 'murky depths of the rightwing mind', 'brain worms abound', 'Genocide Joe', and 'puerile billionaire' indicate a clear bias against the subjects being described.
Use neutral language to describe political groups and individuals, avoiding derogatory terms.
The use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement.
Phrases like 'murky depths of the rightwing mind' and 'brain worms abound' are sensationalist and designed to provoke a strong emotional reaction rather than provide an objective analysis.
Present political theories and opinions without sensationalist language.
Attacking an opponent's character rather than answering their arguments.
The article attacks Kurt Schlichter and Elon Musk personally rather than addressing their arguments or actions in a substantive way.
Focus on the actions or statements of individuals rather than making personal attacks.
Claims that are presented without evidence or support.
The article presents the claim that 'more than 28,000 children have been killed by the relentless Israeli assault on Gaza' without providing evidence or sources for this figure.
Provide evidence or sources for claims, especially when they involve specific figures or allegations.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language and stories, such as the description of Hind Rajab's death, to evoke an emotional response rather than presenting a balanced argument.
Present facts and arguments without relying on emotional manipulation.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.