Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The title and content focus on the sensational aspect of a love triangle involving celebrities, which may not accurately represent the situation.
Reframe the title to focus on the facts without implying drama.
Avoid using charged language that implies controversy where there may be none.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests a dramatic approval of a romantic relationship by Khloe Kardashian, which may not be as sensational as portrayed.
Ensure the headline accurately reflects the content of the article.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article plays on the emotions of the reader by highlighting past relationships and potential drama.
Present information without attempting to evoke a specific emotional response.
Using sources without names which can decrease the credibility of the information.
The article frequently cites 'insiders' and 'sources' without revealing their identities, making it difficult to verify the claims.
Where possible, use named and verifiable sources.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.