Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Stephen Colbert
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of shocking or exciting language at the expense of accuracy to provoke public interest.
The title 'Stephen Colbert Sums Up Trump's List Of Legal Woes In 4 Blunt Words' and the quote 'This is fucked up' are examples of sensationalism designed to provoke a strong emotional response.
Use a more neutral title and refrain from including profanity or overly dramatic language in the article.
Language that is partial or prejudiced towards particular views or groups.
Phrases like 'insane day for America' and 'keeps quoting horse Hitler' indicate a lack of neutrality and inject the author's personal bias into the article.
Replace biased phrases with neutral language that presents the facts without personal opinion.
Claims made without evidence to support them.
The statement 'no one, no one doubts that he did these things' is an unsubstantiated claim, as it assumes a universal belief without providing evidence for such a consensus.
Provide evidence for claims made or acknowledge when a statement reflects an opinion rather than a fact.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The use of phrases like 'This is fucked up' and the description of Trump's legal issues as 'not normal' are designed to elicit an emotional response rather than presenting an objective analysis.
Focus on presenting the legal facts and avoid language that is designed to provoke an emotional response.
A headline that is not representative of the content of the article or overstates its conclusions.
The headline suggests a summary of Trump's legal issues but instead focuses on Stephen Colbert's commentary, which may mislead readers about the content of the article.
Ensure the headline accurately reflects the content of the article and does not overstate its focus on Colbert's views.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.