Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Trump's Campaign
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of emotionally charged words and phrases that may influence the reader's perception.
Words like 'failed bid', 'weaponization', 'virtue signaling', 'disingenuous', and 'sanctimonious' indicate a negative tone towards certain subjects and positive towards others.
Use neutral language to describe events and individuals' actions without implying judgment.
The use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement.
Phrases like 'latest backer', 'marked impact', and 'burn through cash' are sensational and may exaggerate the significance of the events described.
Present the information in a more measured and factual manner without using language that may exaggerate the impact.
Claims that are presented without evidence or sufficient support.
Statements such as 'Malik's decision to become this visible and outspoken in his support of Trump is a rarity among his peers' and 'donor dream that never became reality' are presented without evidence.
Provide evidence or data to support claims, or present them as opinions rather than facts.
Using the opinion of an authority figure, or institution of authority, in place of an actual argument.
The article references the Council of Foreign Relations and the Federal Election Commission records as a way to bolster the credibility of the subject without providing additional context or analysis.
Include a broader range of perspectives and data to support statements rather than relying solely on authority figures or institutions.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.