Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of hyperbolic and emotionally charged language to exaggerate the impact of an event.
Phrases like 'changing football history', 'devastating predator', 'hypnotic ruthlessness of a peregrine falcon', 'pace and agility coming out the wazoo', 'worked gangbusters', and 'squeezed every last drop of magic' sensationalize Messi's abilities and Guardiola's tactical decision.
Use more measured language to describe Messi's abilities and the impact of Guardiola's tactics.
Provide a balanced view by including opinions from other experts or data to support the claims.
Language that is partial or shows favoritism towards a particular view or outcome.
The article uses biased language in favor of Messi and Guardiola, such as 'Bravo, Pep. Bravo.' and 'arguably the finest and most complete footballer of all time.'
Avoid language that implies unwarranted praise or criticism without evidence.
Include a variety of perspectives to provide a balanced view.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article appeals to the emotions of the reader by using dramatic language and glorifying the achievements of Messi and Guardiola without providing a critical analysis.
Focus on presenting the facts and analysis of the tactical change rather than using language designed to elicit an emotional response.
Presenting one viewpoint or side of an argument without sufficient counterargument or perspective from the opposing side.
The article does not present any critical perspectives or potential downsides of the tactical change, nor does it discuss any opposing views.
Include perspectives from other coaches, players, or analysts who may have a different view on the tactical change.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.