Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Chiefs
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article starts with a sensationalist tone, suggesting that the outcome of the Super Bowl is a foregone conclusion.
Present the game as an upcoming competitive event with uncertain outcomes to avoid sensationalism.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article appeals to the emotions of the reader by highlighting the personal relationship between Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift, which is irrelevant to the game's outcome.
Remove personal stories that do not directly relate to the teams' performance or strategies.
Claims that are presented without evidence or support.
The article makes claims about the Chiefs' motivation and historical awareness without providing evidence of how this affects their chances of winning.
Provide evidence or statements from the team that support the claim that their historical awareness will impact their performance.
Language that is partial or prejudiced towards particular views or outcomes.
The language used throughout the article is biased towards the Chiefs, with phrases like 'the only question was by how much rather than if' indicating a lack of objectivity.
Use neutral language that does not imply a predetermined outcome of the game.
Leaving out important details that could change the overall understanding of the topic.
The article omits any discussion of the 49ers' strengths or potential strategies that could lead to their victory.
Include information about the 49ers' performance and strategies to provide a balanced view of both teams' chances.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.