Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Tim Sheehy
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of superlatives and dramatic language to provoke interest.
The use of terms like 'American Hero', 'highly successful Businessman', 'incredible Chairman', 'patriotic Senators', 'MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!', 'Political Outsider', 'Strong on the Border', 'under siege Second Amendment', 'Radical Left Democrats', 'Destroying our Country', and 'America First Patriot'.
Use neutral language to describe individuals and avoid superlatives unless they are directly quoted from a source.
Provide evidence or context for terms like 'under siege' to avoid sensationalism.
Language that is partial or prejudiced towards one side.
The article uses biased language such as 'Lazy Jon Tester', 'Radical Left Democrats', 'Destroying our Country', and 'career politicians selling out our country'.
Replace biased terms with neutral descriptions of the individuals or groups.
Avoid using derogatory nicknames and provide a balanced view of each candidate's policies and track record.
Using the opinion of an authority figure as evidence instead of using logical reasoning or evidence.
The article emphasizes Trump's endorsement and the support of other Republican senators as a form of validation for Tim Sheehy without providing substantial evidence for his qualifications or policy positions.
Include information on Tim Sheehy's qualifications and policy positions independently of the endorsements.
Present endorsements as opinions rather than as definitive proof of a candidate's suitability.
Leaving out important facts or details that could change the perception of the story.
The article does not provide any information on Jon Tester's response to the endorsement or his qualifications and achievements, which could provide a more balanced view.
Include Jon Tester's perspective, qualifications, and achievements to provide a balanced view.
Present information on the political context and the positions of both candidates.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.