Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article uses sensational language such as 'Big Chief White Shoes', 'glove puppet Maradona', and 'chaotic as a rodeo on donkeys' to provoke a reaction from the reader.
Use neutral language to describe events and individuals involved.
Language that is biased or contains a partial perspective.
Terms like 'Big Chief White Shoes', 'influencer queen', and 'little obvious talent' indicate a negative bias towards the subjects.
Replace biased terms with neutral descriptions of the individuals and events.
Attacking the character of an individual instead of addressing the argument or issue at hand.
The article attacks Gianni Infantino's character by comparing him to his predecessor and calling him 'little different to his predecessor Sepp Blatter — but in trendy boots'.
Focus on the policies and actions of the individual rather than personal characteristics.
Claims made without evidence to support them.
The article makes claims about FIFA's motives, such as 'chasing power' and 'constructing an empire', without providing evidence.
Provide evidence or sources to support claims made in the article.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article or are exaggerated to attract attention.
The headline suggests a comparison between Kim Kardashian and a 'glove puppet Maradona' which is not central to the content of the article.
Ensure the headline accurately reflects the main focus of the article.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
Phrases like 'our wonderful game' and 'the game’s founding nation' are designed to evoke an emotional response from the reader.
Present information in a way that does not attempt to manipulate the reader's emotions.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.