Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Democrats
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of sensational language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.
The use of phrases like 'spoiler third-party candidates' and 'danger and a warning' can be seen as sensational, as they dramatize the impact of third-party candidates without providing a balanced view.
Provide a balanced view of third-party candidates' impact on elections without using dramatic language.
Use of language that implies a preference or bias towards one side or another.
The article uses biased language when discussing third-party candidates, labeling them as 'dangerous' and implying that a vote for them is a 'Trump vote', which may not represent the views of all readers or the broader electorate.
Use neutral language when describing the impact of third-party candidates on the election.
Reporting that disproportionately covers one side of an issue or one aspect of a story.
The article focuses heavily on the Democratic strategist's perspective and does not provide equivalent coverage or counterpoints from Republican strategists or third-party representatives.
Include perspectives from Republican strategists and third-party representatives to provide a more balanced view.
Leaving out information that is crucial to understanding the full context of the issue.
The article does not provide information on the specific policies or platforms of the third-party candidates, which is key to understanding why they may or may not be 'spoilers' in the election.
Include information on the third-party candidates' policies and platforms to give readers a fuller understanding of their potential impact on the election.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.