Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
US Court
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of phrases that may convey a negative tone towards one side
The phrase 'It is a setback for Trump who has for years cited presidential immunity while battling multiple cases.' uses language that could be perceived as biased, suggesting a pattern of behavior without providing context or counterpoints.
Provide additional context for Trump's previous claims of presidential immunity and include statements from neutral legal experts.
The article does not equally represent both sides of the issue
The article predominantly focuses on the court's ruling and the potential negative implications for Trump, with less emphasis on the reasoning behind Trump's claim for immunity or the potential consequences of denying such immunity for future presidents.
Include more information on the legal arguments supporting Trump's position and the implications for the office of the presidency.
The article may evoke an emotional response rather than presenting an objective analysis
The statement from Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung about future presidents being 'immediately indicted by the opposing party' without immunity could be seen as an appeal to fear and partisanship rather than a legal argument.
Clarify the legal standards for indicting a president and provide expert analysis on the likelihood of such scenarios.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.