Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Universal Music Group
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The use of emotionally charged words to sway the reader's opinion.
Terms like 'toxic divorce', 'bully', 'intimidation', and 'greed' are used to describe the actions and attitudes of the parties involved, particularly painting TikTok in a negative light.
Use neutral language to describe the situation and the actions of both parties.
Leaving out important details that could help the reader form a more balanced view.
The article does not provide TikTok's perspective in detail or discuss the specifics of the disagreement, such as the terms offered by TikTok and how they compare to industry standards.
Include TikTok's response and details of the proposed terms for a balanced view.
Presenting one side of an argument more favorably than the other.
The article heavily features UMG's point of view and accusations against TikTok, while TikTok's response is summarized briefly and presented as a counter-argument rather than a co-equal perspective.
Provide equal space and consideration to TikTok's statements and arguments.
The headline suggests a finality and a broader impact than what is detailed in the article.
The headline implies that TikTok has already lost major music artists, which may not be the case if negotiations are still ongoing or if alternative arrangements are made.
Rephrase the headline to reflect the current state of negotiations, such as 'TikTok and Universal Music Group at Impasse Over Licensing Agreement'.
Manipulating the reader's emotions to sway their opinion.
The article uses emotionally charged language and presents UMG's accusations in a way that may elicit an emotional response from the reader, particularly sympathy for artists and antipathy towards TikTok.
Stick to factual reporting without using language that is designed to elicit an emotional response.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.