JANET STREET-PORTER: And the Oscar for the angriest feminist goes to... why Barbie star Ryan Gosling needs to man up and ignore the trolls demanding he give back his best supporting actor nomination.

[ 26/01/2024 17:09 ] Read on dailymail.co.uk

Report Overview: The article contains numerous instances of biased language, sensationalism, appeal to emotion, and unsubstantiated claims. The tone is subjective and there are ad hominem attacks against groups of people. The article also presents a one-sided view, favoring Ryan Gosling and the film 'Barbie' over the Oscars and other films, without providing a balanced perspective.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Ryan Gosling and 'Barbie' (80)

Oscars and other films (10)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Ryan Gosling and 'Barbie'

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Biased language

Using language that is partial or prejudiced.

Phrases like 'angriest feminist', 'man up', and 'grovel and apologise for being honoured' show a clear bias.

Use neutral language that does not carry judgmental connotations.

Sensationalism

Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy.

The title and the overall tone of the article are sensational, focusing on conflict and strong emotions.

Present information in a more measured and factual manner.

Appeal to emotion

Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.

The article appeals to the reader's emotions by using charged language and presenting a polarized view of the situation.

Provide evidence and reasoned arguments instead of appealing to emotions.

Unsubstantiated claims

Claims that are made without evidence to support them.

Statements like 'political correctness means that Ryan Gosling must grovel and apologise' are presented without evidence.

Back up claims with verifiable evidence or data.

Ad hominem attacks

Attacking the character of a person rather than the argument they are making.

Referring to people who may like 'Poor Thing' as 'pretentious tw**s' is an ad hominem attack.

Focus on critiquing the argument or the work itself, not the people who may enjoy it.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.