Just when did Australia go so woke? How left-wing, anti-British ideology and virtue-signalling is sweeping the country - with Captain Cook statue toppled, Queen Victoria memorial vandalised and even TV comedies apologising for being filmed on 'stolen land'.

[ 25/01/2024 13:46 ] Read on dailymail.co.uk

Report Overview: The article contains numerous instances of biased language, sensationalism, misleading headlines, and unbalanced reporting. It presents a one-sided view that heavily favors the perspective of those opposed to 'woke' ideology and does not provide a balanced or objective representation of the views of those who support the changes in Australia.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Anti-'woke' perspective

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Sensationalism

Use of sensational language to provoke interest at the expense of accuracy.

The headline and the overall tone of the article use sensational language such as 'woke', 'anti-British ideology', and 'virtue-signalling' to provoke a strong emotional response.

Use neutral language and avoid emotionally charged terms.

Misleading headlines

Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.

The headline suggests a sweeping change across Australia due to 'woke' ideology, which is not objectively substantiated in the article.

Ensure the headline accurately reflects the content of the article.

Biased language

Language that is partial or prejudiced towards one side.

Terms like 'woke rubbish', 'hard-left group Antifa', and 'noisy minority' indicate a bias against certain groups and ideologies.

Use neutral terms and avoid language that indicates a bias.

Unbalanced reporting

Reporting that disproportionately covers one viewpoint over another.

The article predominantly presents the anti-'woke' perspective, with little to no representation of the opposing viewpoint.

Provide equal coverage and representation of all relevant viewpoints.

Selective use of sources

Choosing sources that support one side of an argument while ignoring others.

The article quotes individuals and sources that support the anti-'woke' perspective, without including sources from the other side of the debate.

Include sources that represent a range of perspectives on the issue.

Appeal to emotion

Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.

The article uses emotionally charged language and anecdotes to appeal to the reader's emotions, particularly fear and nostalgia for the past.

Present information in a way that appeals to logic and reason rather than emotion.

Omission of key information

Leaving out important details that could change the overall understanding of the topic.

The article does not provide context or reasoning behind the actions of those labeled as 'woke', such as the historical and cultural significance of 'Invasion Day'.

Include all relevant information and context to provide a complete understanding of the issue.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.