Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Thomas Grant
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of language that implies a negative connotation without providing evidence.
The use of terms like 'annoying', 'nuisance', and 'invasion of privacy' in the headline and the article, as well as 'spam spam spam', and 'ScammySammy' in user comments, suggests a negative view of the robocalls without providing objective evidence of their impact.
Use neutral language to describe the robocalls and the lawsuit, such as 'alleged nuisance calls' or 'disputed robocalls'.
The use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement.
The headline 'Vivek Ramaswamy hit with a lawsuit over ‘annoying’ New Hampshire robocalls' uses sensational language to attract attention.
Rephrase the headline to something more neutral, such as 'Vivek Ramaswamy faces lawsuit regarding New Hampshire robocalls'.
When an article presents one side of an issue more favorably than the other without a justified reason.
The article does not provide a response from Vivek Ramaswamy's campaign, which could offer balance to the claims made by Thomas Grant.
Include a statement or response from Vivek Ramaswamy's campaign if available, or note the attempt to contact them for a response.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.