Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Tesla
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of subjective or emotionally charged language that indicates a lack of neutrality.
Phrases like 'extremely cringey', 'wild', and 'cringe' indicate a subjective tone that may influence the reader's perception of the events being described.
Use neutral language to describe events and statements without adding subjective commentary.
The use of exciting or shocking stories or language at the expense of accuracy, in order to provoke public interest or excitement.
The discussion of Elon Musk's visit to Auschwitz and his comments thereafter are presented in a sensational manner, focusing on the controversial aspects to captivate the audience.
Present the facts of the visit and the subsequent discussion without emphasizing the controversial nature of the comments.
A lack of balance in reporting, where one side of an argument or issue is favored or given more attention than the other.
The article focuses heavily on the criticisms and controversial aspects of Elon Musk's actions and statements, with less attention given to neutral or positive perspectives.
Include a more balanced range of opinions and perspectives on Elon Musk's actions and statements.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article's tone and choice of words are designed to elicit an emotional response, particularly when discussing Musk's visit to Auschwitz and his political affiliations.
Provide a more dispassionate account of events and statements, focusing on the facts rather than attempting to evoke an emotional response.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.