Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Joe Biden
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The phrase 'coup-attempting former president' is sensational and implies a strong bias against Donald Trump.
Use neutral language to describe Donald Trump's actions, such as 'former president who contested the 2020 election results'.
Use of language that implies a prejudice for or against someone or something.
Terms like 'saddled their party with someone who could well be a convicted felon' show a clear bias against Donald Trump.
Rephrase to maintain neutrality, such as 'Republican voters in Iowa and New Hampshire have chosen a candidate who is facing legal challenges'.
Claims made without evidence to support them.
The article states that Trump 'could well be a convicted felon by the time of the November election,' which is speculative and not supported by evidence at the time of writing.
Provide evidence for claims or clarify that they are speculative.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The repeated requests for financial support at the end of the article may be seen as an appeal to emotion, particularly the statements about the 'foundations of our democracy' being at stake.
Separate factual reporting from requests for support to avoid conflating the two.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.