Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Centrist Voters
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's title 'Michelle Obama may already be working on a 2024 White House bid' is sensational and speculative without providing concrete evidence.
Provide evidence for claims made in the title or rephrase it to reflect the speculative nature of the content.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests that Michelle Obama is actively working on a presidential campaign, which is not substantiated within the article.
Align the headline with the content of the article, ensuring it accurately represents the information provided.
Use of language that is partial or prejudiced towards particular views or outcomes.
Phrases like 'sicko political environment', 'professional doubters', 'squalid squad', and 'dodo-in-chief' indicate a strong bias and lack of neutrality.
Use neutral language to describe political figures and environments.
Claims made without evidence or support.
Statements such as 'Obama has polled donors' and 'Michelle gets nominated' are presented without evidence.
Provide sources or evidence for claims, or clearly label them as speculation.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language to create a sense of urgency and fear about the political situation, such as 'The system is broken' and 'America the Beautiful. Our country ’tis of what!?'
Present information in a way that appeals to reason rather than emotion.
Selectively presenting data that confirms a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related data or information that may contradict that position.
The article focuses on negative aspects of certain political figures and parties without providing a balanced view or acknowledging positive contributions.
Include a balanced range of information and perspectives to provide a more comprehensive view of the political landscape.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.