Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Michelle Obama
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's title 'Michelle Obama may already be working on a 2024 White House bid' is sensationalist as it suggests a certainty and immediacy that is not supported by the content.
Use a more neutral title that reflects the speculative nature of the content, such as 'Speculation surrounds potential Michelle Obama 2024 presidential bid'.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests that Michelle Obama is actively working on a presidential bid, which is not substantiated within the article.
Align the headline with the content of the article to accurately reflect the speculative nature of the information presented.
Use of language that is partial or prejudiced towards one side or another.
Terms like 'sicko political environment', 'dodo-in-chief', and 'squalid squad' indicate a strong bias and lack of neutrality.
Replace biased terms with neutral language to present information objectively.
Claims made without evidence or support.
Statements such as 'Obama has polled donors' and 'Michelle gets nominated' are presented without evidence.
Provide evidence for claims or clarify that they are speculative.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
Phrases like 'America the Beautiful. Our country ’tis of what!?' are designed to evoke emotional responses rather than present factual information.
Focus on factual reporting rather than emotional appeals.
Presenting one viewpoint without the necessary counterbalancing context.
The article focuses heavily on negative aspects of the current political situation and potential strategies of Michelle Obama without providing balanced viewpoints or responses from the individuals mentioned.
Include responses or perspectives from the other side to provide a balanced view.
Selectively presenting only the data that supports a particular position.
The article mentions 'a VIP doctor in charge of a major hospital' and 'the new group No Labels' without providing broader context or alternative perspectives.
Present a wider range of sources and viewpoints to avoid cherry-picking.
Attacking the character of a person rather than addressing the substance of their argument or position.
Referring to Joe Biden as 'dodo-in-chief' is an ad hominem attack that undermines the objectivity of the article.
Avoid personal attacks and focus on the political positions and actions of the individuals involved.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.