Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Joe Biden
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article uses sensational language such as 'sicko political environment', 'semi VIPs itch', and 'squalid squad'.
Use neutral language to describe the political environment and individuals involved.
A headline that is not supported by the text of the article or misrepresents its content.
The headline suggests Michelle Obama is working on a 2024 bid, but the article does not provide concrete evidence to support this claim.
Change the headline to reflect the speculative nature of the content, such as 'Speculation about Michelle Obama's Potential 2024 White House Bid'.
Claims made without evidence or based on rumors.
Claims such as 'Obama has polled donors' and 'Michelle gets nominated' are presented without evidence.
Provide evidence for the claims or clarify that they are rumors and not verified information.
Language that is partial or prejudiced, favoring or disfavoring something in an unfair way.
Terms like 'dodo-in-chief' and 'screwed-up Congress' indicate a lack of objectivity.
Use neutral terms to describe political figures and institutions.
Use of sources without names, which can undermine the credibility of the information.
The article cites 'credible sources few have access to' and a 'VIP doctor' without revealing their identities.
Whenever possible, use named and verifiable sources.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
Phrases like 'America the Beautiful. Our country ’tis of what!?' are designed to evoke emotional responses.
Focus on factual reporting rather than emotional appeals.
Presenting one viewpoint without the counterbalancing views.
The article focuses heavily on negative aspects of the political environment and potential candidates, with little balance.
Provide a balanced view by including positive aspects and counterarguments.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.