Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Michelle Obama
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The entire tone of the article is sensationalist, with phrases like 'sicko political environment', 'semi VIPs itch', and 'squalid squad'.
Use a neutral tone and avoid emotionally charged language.
A headline that is not supported by the text of the article or is exaggerated to attract readers.
The headline 'Michelle Obama may already be working on a 2024 White House bid' suggests certainty and immediacy that is not substantiated in the article.
Change the headline to reflect the speculative nature of the content, such as 'Speculation arises about Michelle Obama's potential 2024 White House bid'.
Claims that are made without evidence or support.
The article makes various claims without providing evidence, such as 'Obama has polled donors' and 'Their plan is currently being tweaked'.
Provide evidence for the claims or clarify that they are rumors or speculation.
Language that is partial or prejudiced, supporting or opposing a particular side or position.
The article uses biased language such as 'dodo-in-chief', 'screwed-up Congress', and 'damp Biden'.
Use neutral language and avoid derogatory terms.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
Phrases like 'America the Beautiful. Our country ’tis of what!?' are designed to evoke emotional responses rather than present objective information.
Focus on factual reporting rather than emotional appeals.
Presenting one side of a story or argument without a fair representation of the opposing viewpoint.
The article focuses heavily on negative aspects of the current political situation and potential plans of Michelle Obama, with only a brief mention of Joe Biden's campaign as a counterpoint.
Provide a more balanced view by including more information and perspectives from both sides.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.