Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Centrist Voters
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's title and content suggest a dramatic and unverified political maneuver involving Michelle Obama without providing evidence.
Provide evidence for claims, use a neutral tone, and avoid dramatic language.
Use of language that is partial or prejudiced towards one side or another.
Terms like 'sicko political environment', 'dodo-in-chief', and 'squalid squad' indicate a strong bias.
Use neutral language and avoid derogatory terms.
Claims made without evidence or support.
Statements like 'Obama has polled donors' and 'Michelle gets nominated' are presented without evidence.
Provide sources or evidence for claims made.
Attacking the person rather than the argument or issue.
Referring to Joe Biden as 'dodo-in-chief' and 'temp' is a personal attack rather than a critique of his policies or actions.
Focus on policies or actions rather than personal attacks.
Presenting one side of an argument without a fair representation of the opposing viewpoint.
The article heavily criticizes certain political figures while only briefly mentioning others, without providing a balanced view.
Provide equal coverage and assessment of all sides involved.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language like 'toxic', 'sore loser laws', and 'screwed-up Congress' to provoke a response.
Present information factually without relying on emotional language.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.