Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Centrist Voters
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article's title and content suggest a dramatic and unverified scenario regarding Michelle Obama's potential candidacy, which is sensationalist.
Use a more neutral title and avoid speculative language without evidence.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests that Michelle Obama is working on a White House bid, but the article does not provide concrete evidence to support this claim.
Ensure the headline accurately reflects the content of the article.
Use of language that is partial or prejudiced towards one side or another.
Terms like 'sicko political environment', 'dodo-in-chief', and 'squalid squad' indicate a biased and derogatory tone.
Use neutral language and avoid derogatory terms.
Claims made without evidence or support.
The article makes various claims about political strategies and intentions without providing evidence, such as 'Obama has polled donors' and 'Michelle gets nominated'.
Provide evidence for claims or clarify when information is speculative.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article appeals to fear and frustration with phrases like 'the system is broken' and 'bodes badly for the country'.
Focus on factual reporting rather than emotional manipulation.
Presenting one viewpoint without the counterbalancing views.
The article focuses heavily on negative aspects of certain political figures and parties, without providing a balanced view or adequate representation of their perspectives.
Provide a balanced view by including multiple perspectives and counterarguments.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.