Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Centrist Candidates
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The article uses sensational language such as 'sicko political environment', 'semi VIPs itch', and 'dodo-in-chief'.
Use neutral language to describe the political environment and individuals involved.
A headline that is not supported by the text of the article or misrepresents its content.
The headline 'Michelle Obama may already be working on a 2024 White House bid' suggests certainty and immediacy that is not substantiated in the article.
Rephrase the headline to reflect the speculative nature of the content, such as 'Speculation arises about a potential 2024 White House bid by Michelle Obama'.
Claims made without evidence or support.
The article makes claims about Michelle Obama's potential candidacy and Joe Biden's campaign without providing evidence.
Provide evidence or sources for the claims made about the individuals' political plans.
Language that is partial or prejudiced, favoring or disfavoring something in an unfair way.
Terms like 'squalid squad', 'screwed-up Congress', and 'dodo-in-chief' indicate a biased perspective.
Replace biased terms with neutral descriptions of the political entities and individuals.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article appeals to fear and frustration with phrases like 'Fears and thoughts on the dysfunction are not unwarranted' and 'The system is broken'.
Present information in a way that encourages rational analysis rather than emotional reaction.
Presenting one viewpoint or side disproportionately to others.
The article focuses heavily on negative aspects of the current political situation and potential candidates, with little balance or representation of other perspectives.
Include a more balanced view of the political situation and the potential candidates' platforms and qualifications.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.