Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Joe Biden
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Use of exciting or shocking stories at the expense of accuracy, to provoke public interest or excitement.
The headline 'Michelle Obama may already be working on a 2024 White House bid' is sensational and speculative without concrete evidence.
Use a more neutral headline that reflects the speculative nature of the content, such as 'Speculation arises about Michelle Obama's potential political plans'.
Headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article.
The headline suggests a definitive action by Michelle Obama, which is not substantiated in the article.
Align the headline with the content of the article to accurately reflect the speculative nature of the information provided.
Use of language that is partial or prejudiced towards one side.
Terms like 'sicko political environment', 'dodo-in-chief', and 'squalid squad' indicate a biased and derogatory perspective.
Remove inflammatory and derogatory language to present a more neutral and objective tone.
Presenting one side of a story without a fair representation of the opposing viewpoint.
The article heavily focuses on negative speculation about Michelle Obama and Joe Biden, without providing balanced viewpoints or responses from the individuals mentioned.
Include statements or perspectives from the individuals or parties mentioned to provide a balanced view.
Claims that are not supported by evidence or sources.
The article makes various claims about political strategies and intentions without providing evidence or named sources.
Provide evidence or credible sources to support the claims made in the article.
Attempting to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument.
The article uses emotionally charged language and scenarios to provoke a response from the reader, such as 'The system is broken' and 'America the Beautiful. Our country ’tis of what!?'
Focus on factual reporting and logical arguments rather than emotional appeals.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.